Bro-Shaming TradCons and the Prancing Nancies of the PUA

I’ve not posted in a while, but I’ve been monitoring the manosphere consistently ,and participating in the comment sections of others sites to some degree, under various guises.

I’m sad to report that the men’s movement is being mainstreamed, with PUA’s and Tradcons uniting in a full out front against MGTOW, the truly revolutionary facet of the movement.

The recent dustup between Paul Elam et al and some in the youtube MGTOW movement (Sandman and others, but I mention sandman because his genius should not go unmentioned) is most distressing.  Elam and his camp claim to be saving the mgtow movement from “those who would try to define it”, but in reality they are trying to control it and mold it to their own liking.  The main issue seems to be the issue of marriage.  They said Sandman holds that real mgtows cannot be married, Elams married staffers of course would like to say mgtow can be married.   I tend to believe marriage is a bad idea, but I will not rule it impossible that one might have found the elusive NAWALT,  but the point is that I look to nobody to define what mgtow is, neither sandman, nor elam.    What repulses me is how elam and all have turned to textbook feminist shaming tactics to destroy mgtows, such that even basic and accepted red pill truths have been called “misogynistic”.  Like alpha fux/beta bux.  That is now considered misogyny by AVFM.    It’s not that feminism has warped women’s minds, it’s that feminism has unleashed a woman’s two pronged nature.   And we can and should internalize that knowledge, as men, and live our lives accordingly, knowing in advance how we may be valued differently for different reasons in a women’s reality.  And again, avfm calls this misogyny. While Avfm is to be proud of their work in the activist realm, they have ideologically failed men.

Another vexing concern of mine is the hostility of many establishment tradcon types in the manosphere who are averse to conspiracy theories in any form.  Im thinking Robert Ford and his worship of the city of london.  Banker fetishisist?  Though they have awakened with the red pill, they still refuse to see the oppressiveness of all our institutions.  And they also resort to the shaming tactics and calls to “man up” that are the mainstay of what I though we had all determined was our enemy in common, feminism.    Privatized central banks, the cfr, the u.n. are all real,  and you can go read their agenda on their websites.  It’s not a theory anymore boys.

And of course the PUAs as always are still prancing nancies deperate for female approval, which shows in their femininity in the picking out of “outfits” and such.

I could go on, and I will if someone wants it in the comments section, but I will stop for now.

4 thoughts on “Bro-Shaming TradCons and the Prancing Nancies of the PUA

  1. So where do tradcons come in? AVFM, as I see it, is pretty anti traditionalism. They want equality, human nature be damned.

    Other than that, I also don’t see the point in clashing with MGTOWs. They help anti-feminist progress, if anything. Either way, it shouldn’t be that big of a deal, or what do you think? MGHOW, per definition, will do what he wants to do.

    Like

Leave a comment