Bro-Shaming TradCons and the Prancing Nancies of the PUA

I’ve not posted in a while, but I’ve been monitoring the manosphere consistently ,and participating in the comment sections of others sites to some degree, under various guises.

I’m sad to report that the men’s movement is being mainstreamed, with PUA’s and Tradcons uniting in a full out front against MGTOW, the truly revolutionary facet of the movement.

The recent dustup between Paul Elam et al and some in the youtube MGTOW movement (Sandman and others, but I mention sandman because his genius should not go unmentioned) is most distressing.  Elam and his camp claim to be saving the mgtow movement from “those who would try to define it”, but in reality they are trying to control it and mold it to their own liking.  The main issue seems to be the issue of marriage.  They said Sandman holds that real mgtows cannot be married, Elams married staffers of course would like to say mgtow can be married.   I tend to believe marriage is a bad idea, but I will not rule it impossible that one might have found the elusive NAWALT,  but the point is that I look to nobody to define what mgtow is, neither sandman, nor elam.    What repulses me is how elam and all have turned to textbook feminist shaming tactics to destroy mgtows, such that even basic and accepted red pill truths have been called “misogynistic”.  Like alpha fux/beta bux.  That is now considered misogyny by AVFM.    It’s not that feminism has warped women’s minds, it’s that feminism has unleashed a woman’s two pronged nature.   And we can and should internalize that knowledge, as men, and live our lives accordingly, knowing in advance how we may be valued differently for different reasons in a women’s reality.  And again, avfm calls this misogyny. While Avfm is to be proud of their work in the activist realm, they have ideologically failed men.

Another vexing concern of mine is the hostility of many establishment tradcon types in the manosphere who are averse to conspiracy theories in any form.  Im thinking Robert Ford and his worship of the city of london.  Banker fetishisist?  Though they have awakened with the red pill, they still refuse to see the oppressiveness of all our institutions.  And they also resort to the shaming tactics and calls to “man up” that are the mainstay of what I though we had all determined was our enemy in common, feminism.    Privatized central banks, the cfr, the u.n. are all real,  and you can go read their agenda on their websites.  It’s not a theory anymore boys.

And of course the PUAs as always are still prancing nancies deperate for female approval, which shows in their femininity in the picking out of “outfits” and such.

I could go on, and I will if someone wants it in the comments section, but I will stop for now.

Study shows conspiracy theorists more reasonable, less angry

“Recent studies by psychologists and social scientists in the US and UK suggest that contrary to mainstream media stereotypes, those labeled “conspiracy theorists” appear to be saner than those who accept the official versions of contested events.

The most recent study was published on July 8th by psychologists Michael J. Wood and Karen M. Douglas of the University of Kent (UK). Entitled “What about Building 7? A social psychological study of online discussion of 9/11 conspiracy theories,” the study compared “conspiracist” (pro-conspiracy theory) and “conventionalist” (anti-conspiracy) comments at news websites. 

The authors were surprised to discover that it is now more conventional to leave so-called conspiracist comments than conventionalist ones: “Of the 2174 comments collected, 1459 were coded as conspiracist and 715 as conventionalist.” In other words, among people who comment on news articles, those who disbelieve government accounts of such events as 9/11 and the JFK assassination outnumber believers by more than two to one. That means it is the pro-conspiracy commenters who are expressing what is now the conventional wisdom, while the anti-conspiracy commenters are becoming a small, beleaguered minority. 

Perhaps because their supposedly mainstream views no longer represent the majority, the anti-conspiracy commenters often displayed anger and hostility: “The research… showed that people who favoured the official account of 9/11 were generally more hostile when trying to persuade their rivals.” 

Additionally, it turned out that the anti-conspiracy people were not only hostile, but fanatically attached to their own conspiracy theories as well. According to them, their own theory of 9/11 – a conspiracy theory holding that 19 Arabs, none of whom could fly planes with any proficiency, pulled off the crime of the century under the direction of a guy on dialysis in a cave in Afghanistan – was indisputably true. The so-called conspiracists, on the other hand, did not pretend to have a theory that completely explained the events of 9/11: “For people who think 9/11 was a government conspiracy, the focus is not on promoting a specific rival theory, but in trying to debunk the official account.” 

In short, the new study by Wood and Douglas suggests that the negative stereotype of the conspiracy theorist – a hostile fanatic wedded to the truth of his own fringe theory – accurately describes the people who defend the official account of 9/11, not those who dispute it. 

Additionally, the study found that so-called conspiracists discuss historical context (such as viewing the JFK assassination as a precedent for 9/11) more than anti-conspiracists. It also found that the so-called conspiracists to not like to be called “conspiracists” or “conspiracy theorists.” 

Both of these findings are amplified in the new book Conspiracy Theory in America by political scientist Lance deHaven-Smith, published earlier this year by the University of Texas Press. Professor deHaven-Smith explains why people don’t like being called “conspiracy theorists”: The term was invented and put into wide circulation by the CIA to smear and defame people questioning the JFK assassination! “The CIA’s campaign to popularize the term ‘conspiracy theory’ and make conspiracy belief a target of ridicule and hostility must be credited, unfortunately, with being one of the most successful propaganda initiatives of all time.” 

In other words, people who use the terms “conspiracy theory” and “conspiracy theorist” as an insult are doing so as the result of a well-documented, undisputed, historically-real conspiracy by the CIA to cover up the JFK assassination. That campaign, by the way, was completely illegal, and the CIA officers involved were criminals; the CIA is barred from all domestic activities, yet routinely breaks the law to conduct domestic operations ranging from propaganda to assassinations. 

DeHaven-Smith also explains why those who doubt official explanations of high crimes are eager to discuss historical context. He points out that a very large number of conspiracy claims have turned out to be true, and that there appear to be strong relationships between many as-yet-unsolved “state crimes against democracy.” An obvious example is the link between the JFK and RFK assassinations, which both paved the way for presidencies that continued the Vietnam War. According to DeHaven-Smith, we should always discuss the “Kennedy assassinations” in the plural, because the two killings appear to have been aspects of the same larger crime. 

Psychologist Laurie Manwell of the University of Guelph agrees that the CIA-designed “conspiracy theory” label impedes cognitive function. She points out, in an article published in American Behavioral Scientist (2010), that anti-conspiracy people are unable to think clearly about such apparent state crimes against democracy as 9/11 due to their inability to process information that conflicts with pre-existing belief. 

In the same issue of ABS, University of Buffalo professor Steven Hoffman adds that anti-conspiracy people are typically prey to strong “confirmation bias” – that is, they seek out information that confirms their pre-existing beliefs, while using irrational mechanisms (such as the “conspiracy theory” label) to avoid conflicting information. 

The extreme irrationality of those who attack “conspiracy theories” has been ably exposed by Communications professors Ginna Husting and Martin Orr of Boise State University. In a 2007 peer-reviewed article entitled“Dangerous Machinery: ‘Conspiracy Theorist’ as a Transpersonal Strategy of Exclusion,” they wrote: 

“If I call you a conspiracy theorist, it matters little whether you have actually claimed that a conspiracy exists or whether you have simply raised an issue that I would rather avoid… By labeling you, I strategically exclude you from the sphere where public speech, debate, and conflict occur.”

But now, thanks to the internet, people who doubt official stories are no longer excluded from public conversation; the CIA’s 44-year-old campaign to stifle debate using the “conspiracy theory” smear is nearly worn-out. In academic studies, as in comments on news articles, pro-conspiracy voices are now more numerous – and more rational – than anti-conspiracy ones. 

No wonder the anti-conspiracy people are sounding more and more like a bunch of hostile, paranoid cranks. “

Article found at:

http://www.presstv.com/detail/2013/07/12/313399/conspiracy-theorists-vs-govt-dupes/

 

Why The New World Order Hates “Paganism”

The New World Order hates paganism, or pre-christian, nature oriented belief systems, precisely because they are actually rational, and they teach an important connection between humanity and nature, a connection which the new world order wants to sever, putting it’s corporations in place of that connection to make a profit, and simulataneously eroding our self-reliance.   Self-reliance and logic itself are enemies of the globalist power hungry elitists.

I know it seems that the globalists are concerned about the environment, are “green oriented” etc, but if you really look at their plans  (UN Agenda 21 in particular)  they are merely using the environment in a cynical way to justify their hateful and elitist depopulation agenda.  It’s not that they love the environment as much as they are looking for ways to villainize humanity itself, and turn us against each other, attempting to force us to re-envision ourselves as a virus on the earth, something evil.  And we are not.  We are Gaia-Sophia’s special project.

They are not trying to reform the troublesome hyper-consumerist, “keeping up with the joneses” mentality which one might imagine would be a necessary part of “saving the environment”  No, because saving the environment is not the real goal, the real goal is fueling elitism and finding reasons to justify the creation of poverty, and the bifurcation of humanity into the haves and the have nots, and then eventually, moving the have nots into work camps, where they will be de facto slaves to the multinationals.

The justifying meme is that people will never stop being hyper-consumerist on their own, and that their purchasing power must be forcibly curtailed via poverty.  And how do they get the elites to enforce these poverty creating policies?  By promising them the “have it all” lifestyle and all that goes with it.  They are paid millions of dollars.  I call this “buying their soul” money.

So the truly powerful, the large shareholders of central banks, the usual villains,  Rothschilds, Schiffs, Sax-Coburg Gothas (house of windsor), are playing an evil game of bifurcating humanity, and their elite pawns, politicians, and corporate execs, are playing a hypocritical game of becoming filthy rich at the cost of everyone else, with environmentalism and the “human virus” meme offered as justification, to themselves, and to the public.

The MRA movement, an insider perspective

If you’re intelligent at all, you’re aware that the smartest things being said on the internet right now are being said by bloggers under the umberella of the men’s human rights activist, or the men’s movement, or the misogynist anti-social pigdogs, depending on your choice of frame.
You can break this movement down into into three basic camps as follows:
The PickUp Artist (PUA)
The Tradition Conservatives (TradCon)
The Men Going Their Own Way. (MGTOW)

The Pick Up Artist movement is mostly guys who are just trying to get laid, and will workout, dress all sporty, and lie to women to accoplish these goals. This is not me, though I do workout. I will not dress to impress, however. I prefer a t-shirt and jeans and do not have nearly the low body fat percentage of these preening she-men. I don’t lie either. it’s against my karmic code. this is the home of some natural alphas, but mostly beta pretenders. they are pretty friendly to other dudes in the bro-verse. It’s politically diverse.
The Traditional Conservative wing tends to be moralistic and conservative, believes that the sexuality of women needs to be controlled with a strong hand, and tends to be taliban-like in their political views. This is the true home of the alpha Dark Triad traits, and the real natural alphas who are ruthless in their treatment of men, and women alike, believing women shouldn’t be allowed to vote, and whiny betas should be put into New World Order slave camps. Many chicks actually dig these dudes, as they are often whine knighting manginas, perfectly suited to the female imperative, though they believe they are immune from the insidious destructiveness of the female organism, due to their awesomeness.
Then there are the Men Going Their Own Way. They have seen enough of the horrifying spectacle that is woman and have decided to live their lives on their own terms. They don’t pedestalize women as the PUA and TradCons do, and have a sense of self outside of validation on worldly or sexual terms. They may or may not be rich. They may or may not get laid a lot. They may often be spiritual in outlook. Politically, they realize that feminism has gone too far in the psychotic war on men. But they also realize that the TradCon (paleface taliban) policies toward women are anti-individual, and as such, are anti-human.
The bottom line is that there are general differences in the way men and women view the world. And the psychotic in each camp tend to try to enlist the services of the state, and the instruments of logic to make their case. I believe the way of the future lies with the men going their own way. Maybe we will come back. Maybe we will come back if laws in this country are not designed to destroy men. Maybe we will come back if the Central Planner totalitarian TradCons will treat us as human beings instead of collaborating with totalitarian globalists trying to “incentivize us” to bear the undue burden created by the 1%, alpha male, dark triad, attitude of entitlement and hatred. What a nice combination.

This post is dedicated to emmatheemo, my very first follower.

PopulistLibertine is here!

Yes folks, here I am, you’re long awaited hero to protect you from the creeping creep of elitist ideologies and anti-human value systems, regardless of their origin or particularities.  People are beautiful, our bodies are beautiful.  We do not need the many ideologies of self-hate and nihilism which are foisted upon us by the powers that be (ptb).  I am part conspiracy theorist, part MGTOW (Men going their own way), and all too human.

I will be destroying the lies and destructive memes which flood the cultural discourse, hopefully giving us all a mental space in which we can actually love ourselves and the others around us, without fear.Righties will call me a socialist. Lefties will call me a Nazi.  I have compassion for these individuals, as they are trapped in the false dichotomy of the counterfeit two party system, which cobbles together ideas and opinion issues, rather haphazardly, into a false binary, to keep the population in one of two ideological plantations, so either may be plausibly enthroned in any given election, according to the needs of the controllers who sit behind the scenes.  The true ideologies of both of these parties is Elitism, and dehumanization.  We’ll get into all of these issues later.